Friday, July 19, 2013
Finally a Local News Station with a Report on Protest Petition WXII 12 , Where is Fox 8 and News 2
Well now we have WXII Channel 12 in Bill O'Neill
who came by to interview me in regards to this issue since me and a big group of citizens in Greensboro fought very hard to get this back to the citizens of Greensboro to see them totally want to repeal the whole statute from the laws 4 years later.
Here is the video and post titled BILL WOULD ELIMINATE PROTEST PETITION
Thanks for the interview and to talk about this issue and as we speak this bill has been referred back to the rules committee in N.C Senate and hopefully it will stay there and not get out to vote on this bill before the end of session.
I can still hear birds chirping at Fox 8 and News 2 where are you?
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Did You See the $80,000 Waste of Taxpayers Money in Today's Greensboro News and Record?
Each county and municipality has to by law under North Carolina General Statute 105-369 publish this in a paid newspaper. How many of you actually cared about looking at this insert in today's paper? Some of these North Carolina laws are such a waste of taxpayers money and having public notices in a dying circulation is not the future of public notices in the State of North Carolina.
We do have our newest member of the North Carolina Senate from Guilford County Dr. Trudy Wade introduce her first bill as a primary sponsor Senate Bill #186 which happens to be a public notice bill and hopefully we can get some momentum behind this bill for it to pass and become law.
If there was ever a complete waste of taxpayers money all you needed to do was pick up today's Greensboro News and Record to see the 21 page insert of tax delinquency in Guilford County but one thing that is known is you can see this on a 24-7 basis on the Guilford County Tax Department Web Site . Hopefully you are lucky to pick up today's paper to see this 21 page insert because tomorrow you will not see it at all and as we can also see from the updated Greensboro News and Record web site public notices are so important to them that they did not make one section for public notices be a part of their revised web site. We can see that the Charlotte Observer partnered with legal notice.org to provide this information for their web content and added a public notices section. Will we see any changes from our local paper? I doubt it.
This blog post brought to you by triad citizens against government waste.
Sunday, March 10, 2013
Electronic Notice is Good for Cary,Apex,Garner,Knightdale,and Raleigh is Good for Every other City in this State
North Carolina Senator Dr. Trudy Wade is a primary sponsor of Senate Bill #186 in regards to public notices in the State of North Carolina. What makes this bill so significant is that we have other cities that have enacted local bills in the past to allow them to have electronic notices. For example way back in 2003 Raleigh and Lake Waccamaw had this bill passed
WACCAMAW TO USE ELECTRONIC MEANS TO PROVIDE PUBLIC
1184 of the 1949 Session Laws, as amended, is amended by adding the following new
adopt ordinances providing that notice of public hearings may be given through
2003.
______________________________________________________________________
Then we also have another bill that was passed in 2007 in Senate Bill #1579 which allowed the towns of Apex, Cary, Garner and Knightdale to have the means of using electronic notices .
These local cities are saving taxpayers money by having the ability to use their own local web site to publish public notices. It is time for every other city and county to also have this ability to do the same thing. What is good for these cities is good for the whole State of North Carolina.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
N.C. Senator Dr. Wade introduces Public Notice Bill #186 in Regards to Publication by Counties and Cities in North Carolina
North Carolina Senator Dr. Trudy Wade introduces a bill today in regards to public notices for counties and cities in the State of North Carolina . Here is a link to the bill and also at the end of this blog post will be the whole bill in a scribd version CLICKHERE.
Public Notice laws in the State of North Carolina needed to upgrade to the computer age . Seeing a bill like this will help in this process. I would like to thank Senator Wade for introducing this important bill to save the taxpayers of this state millions of dollars . We will see how this bill moves through the Senate and will update you on how the N.C. Press Association will cry foul on this bill and it is time to see the taxpayers assisted paid papers money train go bye bye.
________________________________________________________________________________
Monday, February 4, 2013
City of Greensboro Takes Case to Raleigh on revamping Public Notice Laws in North Carolina
The City of Greensboro is approving their legislative agenda to send to the North Carolina State Representatives on February 5, 2013
47. Resolution approving 2013 Legislative Agenda and requesting support thereof by the Guilford County Delegation to the General Assembly.
(Council District: all) (roll call vote) (Attachment #47 to Councilmembers)
48. Resolution approving 2013 Greensboro Partnership Legislative Agenda and requesting support thereof by the Guilford County Delegation to the General Assembly.
(Council District: all) (roll call vote) (Attachment #48 to Councilmembers)
49. Resolution approving 2013 League of Municipalities Legislative Agenda and requesting support thereof by the Guilford County Delegation to the General Assembly.
(Council District: all) (roll call vote) (Attachment #49 to Councilmembers)
Item #12 from the 2013 Legislative agenda is titled Electronic Notice
Greensboro seeks legislation to have the option to use electronic legal public notices in lieu of publication in a newspaper. State law currently requires all legal notices be published or advertised in a newspaper of general circulation that also is a paid paper. The City of Greensboro seeks revision of this law to allow selected legal notices to be published by electronic means on the City's web site. The North Carolina League of Municipalities has approved this item as an advocacy goal for the upcoming season.
Will we see the Greensboro News and Record report on this? Probably not but the tide is turning for updating a state law in regards to public notices that was law before the internet ever came into existence. As we have seen here on this blog Triadwatch is advocating for our state representatives to save the Guilford County taxpayers close to $100,000 to exempt Guilford County from publishing tax delinquency notices once a year in the local papers . Here is the report on that issue on triadwatch CLICKHERE
Hopefully we will see our North Carolina State Representatives see the light on this issue and save the taxpayers money which should not be spent with the internet being the appropriate means of communication in this world today. I am sure the editors all over this state are going to bring out grandma and grandpa to let us all know they do not have the internet but all the taxpayers all over this state need to waste million of dollars having public notices in paid papers which are losing subscribers each year. The days when papers provided a great public service for public notices have been there but it is now the internet which needs to take the next step in this process and save taxpayers money on top of it.
Monday, May 2, 2011
$31,665.96 City of Greensboro Wasteful Spending on Public Notices in Carolina Peacemaker
The above pdf files were done with a public records request to the City of Greensboro and also Guilford County in regards to our local print media outlets and their use of taxpayers money for public notices in their paper.
Since the 1940's public notices in local papers consists of a variety of issues from foreclosure notice, general legal notice, notice of creditors, notice of hearing, notice of meeting, notice of sale, and request for bids.
This post consist of only the City of Greensboro and a local print media paper called Carolina Peacemaker. Since 2-18-2010 the City of Greensboro has spent $31,665.96 to advertise public notices in their weekly paper. The break down is as follows:
Part #1 = $5,872
Part #2 = $4,502.25
Part #3 = $5,952
Part #4 = $8,604.71
Part #5 = $2,141.50
Part #6 = $4,593.50
TOTAL = $31,665.96
We have been hearing a lot of talk from the North Carolina Press Association in regards to a bill that has been filed to do away with these public notices and save the taxpayers plenty of money because a few days ago TRIADWATCH posted about how it cost the taxpayers of Guilford County over $86,000 to publish the tax delinquency of Guilford County in their paper here is a link to that post CLICKHERE .
Here is what the NC Press Association is saying about keeping their taxpayer money pit flowing:
"As with any of these bills that take public notices out of newspapers, where people will actually notice them, NCPA strongly opposes this bill. The concept of "public notices" has always been to make sure as many people as possible in a community are aware of actions being considered or taken by their governing bodies. Few people visit their town or county website on anything approaching a regular basis. Newspapers, on the other hand, through their printed products and digital products, are accessed by large numbers on a daily basis. Publishing public notices through the newspaper ensures they will be in a place that citizens go to for information already. Newspapers also provide an independent verification of publication that meets the requirements of the law"In regards to this post and this paper Carolina Peacemaker if only the African American Community gets the public notice does that mean that the whole city was able to see the public notice . As stated above by the NC Press, newspapers are assessed in large numbers on a daily basis. Do many people read the Carolina Peacemaker in large numbers? Check out page #40 in the Part #1 PDF where Mary Lou Anderson writes that they did use the Greensboro News and Record for their public notice but wanted to go with the Carolina Peacemaker because they were cheaper. Thanks Mary Lou Anderson for looking out for the taxpayer to go cheaper but in reality it is not needed to begin with because each municipality and city can house this information on their web site saving thousands of taxpayers dollars.
In a future post this week we will show the invoices of the Greensboro News and Record in regards to taxpayers money wasted on a grander scale than the Carolina Peacemaker in regards to public notices in our local paid newspapers.
If you would like to make a difference in regards to this issue and save the Guilford County taxpayers plenty of money on a yearly basis it is time to let your state representatives know how you feel and say to them pass House BIll #473 and the Senate Bill #773 here is a link to the North Carolina General Assembly and a section called find your representative CLICKHERE
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Vote The Person Not The Party Act Senate Bill #411
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT TO ELIMINATE THE OPTION OF STRAIGHT-PARTY TICKET VOTING ON BALLOTS IN NORTH CAROLINA.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 163-165.6(e) is repealed.
SECTION 2. G.S. 163-182.1(a)(7) is repealed.
SECTION 3. This act is effective when it becomes law.
It is time this bill becomes law and the straight party ticket become a thing of the past.
Thursday, January 6, 2011
City of Greensboro Initial Draft for 2011 State Legislative Agenda
2011 STATE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
CITY OF GREENSBORO LOCAL LEGISLATION (Items currently part of the Agenda)
1. S415 Appointment of City Attorney
The City will support local legislation amending the City Charter to provide that the Greensboro City Attorney be appointed by and report to the City Council. Greensboro and High Point are the only municipalities in the state in which the City Manager has authority to hire and fire the City Attorney.
2. S416 Limitation of Authority for City Manager to Authorize Service Contracts
The City will support local legislation to limit the Manager’s authority to enter into service contracts. The City will seek change to the City Charter Sec. 4.111, stating that the City
Manager’s authority to enter into contracts for the performance of services shall be according to ordinance duly adopted by City Council.
3. Utility Lien
The City will support local legislation, to become effective July 1, 2010, to amend the City Charter to repeal the City’s authority to place utility liens against the real estate of rental property when a tenant fails to pay and when the water bill is in the name of the tenant.
On October 20, 2009 Council adopted modifications in the lien law provisions utilized by the Greensboro Water Department. This passed by a vote of 7 to 1
______________________________________________________________________________
(Items under consideration for the Agenda)
4. Repeal of the Jordan Lake Rules
It is urged by Councilwoman Wade that the City lobby with other municipalities and counties to repeal or reform the Jordan Lake Rules adopted in 2010 by the General Assembly. The City and Guilford County are not considered significant contributors to the Jordan Lake water quality issues and bear an inequitable portion of the restriction and expense imposed under the regulatory overlay. If a cost benefit analysis of these rules were adopted these restrictions would be reduced or entirely curtailed.
5. Unpaid Parking Tickets and Vehicle Registration
The Council previously supported amendments to NCGS 160A-301, Parking, to allow the Department of Motor Vehicles to refuse to register the vehicles of any person who owns any vehicle that has any past due unpaid parking tickets owed to the City of Greensboro.
The City of Greensboro will compile a list of all persons who own motor vehicles which have outstanding, overdue and unpaid parking tickets in the City of Greensboro. This list will be provided to the County Tax Collector. The Collector will be directed to add this list to the list of persons who have unpaid municipal or county taxes. This will provide the Tax Collector the same remedies as those provided in G.S. 20-50.4 for the collection of fines and penalties.
This is anticipated to greatly reduce the uncollected parking fines.
6. Reform of Expungement Procedure.
It is urged by Councilwoman Bellamy Small that the current procedure of expungement be reformed to increase the availability of this policy to more convicted citizens of North Carolina. Given the increased use of background checks and the increased length of time these background checks cover, an unnecessary portion of society is denied equal footing in competition for jobs. It is urged these policies be amended to make it possible to expunge more convictions after seven years from date of last conviction or incarceration.
7. Reform of Trade License Requirements.
It is urged by Councilwoman Bellamy Small that restrictions on Trade Licenses be amended to allow convicted felons to qualify for a supervised license after release from probation or incarceration. This restricted license would require supervision from a nonrestricted tradesman for a period of one year and also require no new convictions. This policy revision would encourage rehabilitation and education of convicts and probationers to reduce the likelihood of recidivisms.
8. Bullying and Harassing Behavior and Cyber-bullying.
Councilwoman Rakestraw urges the City to support strengthening of the current Cyber Bullying Law. North Carolina General Statute 115C-407.15, Bullying and Harassing Behavior, currently prohibits physical, verbal, or electronic bullying and harassment that takes place on school property, at any school-sponsored function, or on a school bus. The proposed amendment would extend the protection to prohibit bullying and harassment that arises from a relationship or contact made on school premises and continues outside of the school.
9. Increase in Motor Vehicle Revenue
Department of Transportation head Adam Fisher urges the Council to support local legislation authorizing Greensboro to increase the amount of its vehicle levy used for public transportation from ten dollars per vehicle up to but not to exceed sixteen dollars per vehicle. It is anticipated by GTA that this additional revenue would provide up to $1,152,000.00 in new funding. Upon passage of this measure, the total vehicle tax revenue paid to GTA would approximate $2,417,000.00 yearly.
Monday, August 30, 2010
Bartering with the Greensboro Coliseum Just Got More Interesting.Open Letter To City Attorney Terry Wood
Open letter to the Greensboro City Attorney Terry Wood,
I read a online article in the Greensboro News and Record on August 27, 2010 with a title"technically it's money" CLICKHERE. In the article it states that you the city attorney thinks that the bartering with companies is ok at the Greensboro Coliseum.Triadwatch has a ongoing post on bartering at the Greensboro Coliseum now up to PART #5 CLICKHERE .
But let's look at North Carolina State Law.§ 143‑129 thanks to Vie De Malchance CLICKHERE.
Procedure for letting of public contracts.
(a) Bidding Required. – No construction or repair work requiring the estimated expenditure of public money in an amount equal to or more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) or purchase of apparatus, supplies, materials, or equipment requiring an estimated expenditure of public money in an amount equal to or more than ninety thousand dollars ($90,000) may be performed, nor may any contract be awarded therefor, by any board or governing body of the State, or of any institution of the State government, or of any political subdivision of the State, unless the provisions of this section are complied with; provided that The University of North Carolina and its constituent institutions may award contracts for construction or repair work that requires an estimated expenditure of less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) without complying with the provisions of this section.
For purchases of apparatus, supplies, materials, or equipment, the governing body of any political subdivision of the State may, subject to any restriction as to dollar amount, or other conditions that the governing body elects to impose, delegate to the manager, school superintendent, chief purchasing official, or other employee the authority to award contracts, reject bids, or readvertise to receive bids on behalf of the unit. Any person to whom authority is delegated under this subsection shall comply with the requirements of this Article that would otherwise apply to the governing body.
(b) Advertisement and Letting of Contracts. – Where the contract is to be let by a board or governing body of the State government or of a State institution, proposals shall be invited by advertisement in a newspaper having general circulation in the State of North Carolina. Where the contract is to be let by a political subdivision of the State, proposals shall be invited by advertisement in a newspaper having general circulation in the political subdivision or by electronic means, or both. A decision to advertise solely by electronic means, whether for particular contracts or generally for all contracts that are subject to this Article, shall be approved by the governing board of the political subdivision of the State at a regular meeting of the board.
The advertisements for bidders required by this section shall appear at a time where at least seven full days shall lapse between the date on which the notice appears and the date of the opening of bids. The advertisement shall: (i) state the time and place where plans and specifications of proposed work or a complete description of the apparatus, supplies, materials, or equipment may be had; (ii) state the time and place for opening of the proposals; and (iii) reserve to the board or governing body the right to reject any or all proposals.
DID THIS BARTER AGREEMENT GET ADVERTISED LIKE IT SHOULD HAVE UNDER STATE LAW? PLEASE SHOW ME THE PROPER PROCEDURES THE CITY OF GREENSBORO FOLLOWS IN REGARDS TO BARTER AGREEMENTS WITH COMPANIES FOR SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT?
In the News and Record online article here is what the Greensboro City Attorney had to say :
"Earlier this month City Attorney Terry Wood give the practice a thumbs up on what seems to be a technicality. State law allows cities to barter for things like goods and services.
The law, however, requires that construction projects over a certain amount of money be publicly bid and awarded to the lowest bidder.
By that policy, it would seem as though the Coliseum violated the law by hand-picking companies to give tickets or other goodies in exchange for, as in the case of a to-be-built VIP lounge, construction of a new heating and air conditioning system.
Not so, Wood said. The law discusses an “expenditure of public money” and case law shows that must refer to actual cash.
Although the case law does not specifically talk about trade and barter agreements, Wood feels confident it applies.
“What it says is, if you are going to spend city money, you must bid it,” Wood said. “We aren’t spending city money.”
Also in the article the UNC School of Government talks about how this situation with the $270,000 price tag on a barter agreement with Brady Trane on a state of the art HVAC machine should have been bidded out.
Is there any processes for how to handle barter agreements with the City of Greensboro or did Coliseum Director Matt Brown have the autonomy to do as he pleases in regards to bartering at the coliseum?
It will be interesting to see if any Greensboro City Council member will want to talk about this issue or even bring it up but it looks like to some that Greensboro City Attorney is splitting hairs with state law and there needs to be more about this whole issue brought out on the table or see just how much each local municipality can barter and do we need to look at more procedures on when and how you can barter for services on a local and state level.
Will try to get more answers to these questions in future post along with more barter agreements with other local companies.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
North Carolina Needs More Ethics Reform and Transparency on Statewide Authorities , Guest Column by Cathy Poole
The State Government Ethics Act does not cover NC General Assembly Chartered Authority members, such as the Global Transpark Authority, yet these officials may have personal development interests, hold positions on multiple decision-making boards, and exercise great authority over private and public development, including the use of eminent domain to seize private property; and have access to state and federal funds without accountability to the taxpayer.
Another example of the need for a code of ethical conduct is the formation of a Regional Transportation Authority in the Triad. In 1997, the NC General Assembly passed Article 27, GS160A authorizing formation of a Regional Transportation Authority. The Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation (PART) and the Piedmont International Airport Authority (PTIA) that began as an oversight group for the airport, have both evolved into facilitators for land-use and economic development. PTIA is promoting the “Aerotropolis” concept, described as “a powerful engine of economic development” and PART has come under scrutiny for coordinating the “Heart of the Triad” effort as a result of corporate appeal. Significantly, both Authorities have used eminent domain, yet they are not subject to an ethical code.
In another example, Session Law 2008-164 H-2318 authorizes the NC Department of Transportation to enter into private partnership agreements for construction of transportation infrastructure but it does not define an ethical standard for the development and implementation of these agreements.
The undue influence of property developers, corporate interests and a lack of transparency and accountability in land-use and transportation planning is not representative of the population at large and diminishes the public trust and threatens private property rights, agricultural vitality and environmental stability of North Carolina .
Financial systems and democratic government are ultimately based on trust of the administrators, and clearly can and will collapse when administered by avaricious, unethical individuals.
The North Carolina Alliance for Transportation Reform (NCATR) has urged the Executive and Legislative branches of state government to modify the State Government Ethics Act to cover all appointed officials, as well as Authority boards, committees and entities with authority over land-use and transportation planning decisions. Alternatively, we have urged the Executive and Legislative branches to enact a statute to require all such local officials and organizations to create local codes of ethical conduct that address conflict of interest issues and include rigorous enforcement provisions.
This ethical policy should include planners for roads or transportation projects constructed through any public/private partnership arrangement (such as under provisions of H-2318), or through any arrangement where public funds are used.
I have repeatedly requested itemized financial records of funding and expenditures for the "Heart of the Triad" project from Brent McKinney, Executive Director of the Piedmont Authority for Transportation (PART), but he has refused my request. PART was the facilitator of the project. They received an NC DOT grant for an air quality study, but he will not provide the study report or funding amount and they received $50,000 each, from BB&T, Time Warner, and Wachovia which bought seats on the Steering Committee in addition to other private funds. I want to know who the other private donors were and how much they paid to participate. Residents of the 53,000 acre area to be condemned for roads and development were refused a seat on the original steering committee. Three residents stopped their request for $2.25 millon in a Senate Bill, but many questions from numerous taxpayers remain unanswered.
Respectfully,
Cathy M. Poole, Ethics Committee Chair
NC Alliance for Transportation Reform
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Mayor of Greensboro Bill Knight's Campaign Reports are Here and Needs Help with the UNKNOWN
Knight Bill
The new Mayor of Greensboro Bill Knight has turned in his end of the year 2009 campaign contribution forms to the Guilford County Board of Elections with many discrepencies that are simple to get but way too many local politicians think it is ok to not put these items on their forms.
Let's take a look at what our campaign laws of this state have to say.
163‑278.11. Contents of treasurer's statement of receipts and expenditures.
(a) Statements filed pursuant to provisions of this Article shall set forth the following:
(1) Contributions. – Except as provided in subsection (a1) of this section, a list of all contributions received by or on behalf of a candidate, political committee, or referendum committee. The statement shall list the name and complete mailing address of each contributor, the amount contributed, the principal occupation of the contributor, and the date such contribution was received. The total sum of all contributions to date shall be plainly exhibited. Forms for required reports shall be prescribed by the Board. As used in this section, "principal occupation of the contributor" means the contributor's:
a. Job title or profession; and
b. Employer's name or employer's specific field of business activity.
As you can see from the above North Carolina law your campaign forms need to provide this information of job title and profession. From the above scribd document of the mayor's campaign forms he had a total of 29 different campaign contributors and 21 of them are by their treasurer Beth Hemphill labeled "Unknown" which is around a 72% of the forms are not complete and should be amended.
How hard it is to get in touch with these people to find out this information let's take a closer look at some of the unknowns on this list. Google is a great source along with the white pages online to find this information out.
Here is some phone numbers to guide you to the promised land of providing this information to treasurer Beth Hemphill
Jimmy Shoffner 288-2727
Orton Jones 288-8898
Reginald Sipe 273-9312
Michael Nash 370-4144 and if this is the lawyer here is his web site for occupation CLICKHERE, he is even unknown on his address as well
James McNairy III 378-1564 , here is a link to his profession CLICKHERE
Walter Underwood 292-4685
George Brumback 288-8702, the same one on the local bond commission
Jeff Tillman 851-2194, with his own blog runsmart2win CLICKHERE
Anne Callicott (self employed/homemaker), (Zip code: 27408) $200 to SHARP PENCIL PAC on 05/24/05, what is Sharp Pencil PAC? That is Howard Coble's affiliated PAC CLICKHERE
It isn't that hard to get this information and this is just the first posting of campaign forms that will get a second look from this blog and hopefully others as well. We can also note from this end of the year returns there was plenty of contributions that went up to the limit on giving before you have to divulge any information to the board of election with on the scribd document you can see that 22 out of 24 gave the maximum of $50 to his campaign without reporting your vital information.
Maybe in the future it will be that any person who even gives a sum of $1 or more will need to show all their information to the campaign reports not just over $50. We also have a new law where the threshold to report has went from $3,000 down to $1,000 on all campaigns in North Carolina . So this means plenty of more candidates will have to file reports in a timely manner.
Let's see how many other local candidates campaign reports look like and if anyone else like Guilford County Commissioner Kirk Perkins will get a Gold Star for reporting CLICKHERE
or will they be like the mayors reports that you see above which wouldn't even get a Star. The mayor is also Howard Coble's treasurer and is a accountant as well. This is the reporting he does on his own campaign, wow.
More at the Greensboro News and Record with a report at inside scoop titled "It Pays To Be Mayor" CLICKHERE
Roch 101 with a post CLICKHERE
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Greensboro City Council to Vote on Ethics Disclosure on Tuesday, Let The Sunshine In

Item #42 for the Greensboro City Council meeting on Tuesday 10-20-2009 .
Resolution imposing the responsibility on persons elected to the Greensboro City Council to anually file financial and personal interest disclosure forms as required by persons covered by the State of North Carolina Government Ethics Act Chapter 138-a.
To see the whole agenda with attachments click on the title above and this agenda item is on page 163 to 190.Or to see just the agenda item CLICKHERE then proceed to October 20, 2009 agenda.
Reading the background of this agenda item it was brought up by Greensboro City Council member Trudy Wade to bring more transparency and ethics to local government which is sorely needed in the local municipalities. There has been plenty of talk about ethics and transparency in the local campaigns who are running for office . At large candidate Nancy Vaughan started it out with a ethics challenge to all the candidates and now we have the Greensboro City Council agenda item #42 addressing this issue.
It will be very interesting to see what certain sitting Greensboro City Council members have to say about this disclosure form that they are going to vote on to be more transparent and ethical . Here is what local developer and Greensboro City Council member Robbie Perkins had to say back on September 13, 2009 in the Greensboro News & Record with the title "Candidates Call for New Financial Disclosures" CLICKHERE and here is the quote
"Councilman Robbie Perkins said: “It’s a campaign ploy. When the state requires it, I’ll do it.”
We will see what type of campaign ploy Robbie Perkins will produce on tuesday if he votes "no" on this resolution. It will also be interesting to see if Sandra Anderson Groat will not be in favor of this as well because in the past she was concerned about having to have family members also fill out the form as well.
Then we have Greensboro City Council member Zack Matheny who still to this day hasn't come clean on his anonymous investors getting in to the development game off of highway 68 , here is that post titled "Greensboro City Council Member Zack Matheny Still Won't Come Clean on His Anonymous Investors Off of Highway 68", CLICKHERE . We all know that Zack Matheny reads the blogs and also post comments as well because in the past few days he was posted on guarino's blog CLICKHERE and also on ed cone's blog CLICKHERE . The clock is still running with no response as to who all was involved in the development game off of highway 68.
This agenda item will be great to see just how your local sitting Greensboro City Council members feel about transparency and ethics. Will the Mayor Yvonne Johnson be in favor of this and if not can Bill Knight make a campaign issue out of this.
Then we also have the candidates for the at large races in incumbents Robbie Perkins and Sandra Anderson Groat will they say no to this and can the other challengers make an issue of this before the citizens vote. Will post more after the Greensboro City Council meeting and with time to watch the video of the council meeting as well.
Sunday, July 12, 2009
This Trip on Local Developer Roy Carroll's Plane Stinks To High Heaven
The Greensboro News & Record has a lead editorial with a title "Say No To Friendly Skies" CLICKHERE
In the editorial this is what was said in the second section
Failing the sniff test?
That may be so, steamed High Point blogger Keith Brown, but this trip "stunk to high heaven."
At issue is the fact that Carroll does business with the city and county governments. He received tax incentives from both entities to help build a new 17-story downtown tower, Center Pointe. Could his generosity with the free flight curry favor for him with elected leaders in the future?
It's a fair question. Yet, in times like these, public-private partnerships are especially valuable and necessary. "If we have private businesses that are willing to help get our elected leaders to a location to bring dollars back to Greensboro, then, by golly, we ought to do it," Sanders said.
There certainly is plenty of precedent for such partnerships in recent years. For instance, the nonprofit economic booster group Action Greensboro footed the bill for jet trips to Oklahoma City for citizens and city leaders in 2002, and Columbus, Ga., and Chattanooga, Tenn., in 2001.
As long as those relationships are up-front and transparent, shouldn't they be permitted for the common good they promote?
In the case of Carroll, yes, he has received incentives and, as a developer, yes, he does periodically come before local boards on zoning matters. But his company is not involved in the South Elm/Lee Street development. "He has no vested interest in what is happening on that site," Sanders said. "All he was trying to do was to be a good citizen."
Let me explain that the quote "stunk to high heaven" was in a email exchange with the News & Record so if you ever send a email to them you might just get quoted with anything you say.
As we have seen from the above quote from Walker Sanders from the Community Foundation he states that Roy Carroll has no vested interest in what is happening on this site.But let's take a look at what was reported in the Triad Business Journal paper edition July 10-16 2009 called Triad Talk from Justin Catanoso with a title on front page "Sanders Simmers Over an Opportunity Wasted" here is what was in the article:
"The normally affable and easy-going Walker Sanders was fuming this week, disappointed that a tough-to-coordinate trip to Washington, D.C., fell apart due to perception problems, and downright angry that too many people in Greensboro “seem to spend more time killing deals than trying to make things happen.”
You say perception problems others say ethical problems just ask the Greensboro City Attorney Terry Wood who said this in the editorial,"City Attorney Terry Wood disagrees. "Regardless of what (the School of Government) says, I'm pretty sure I'm right," said Wood, specifically of General Statute 133-32 that forbids any contractor who "has contract with a government agency" or "anticipates bidding on such a contract in the future" to provide gifts to elected officials who decide on such contracts.
"I am sure this is all well-intended," Wood said, "but Roy Carroll is a contractor with the city."
Then if you read more of the story in the business journal ,this is what was said about this whole elm street project" Essentially, the deal looks like this. The school system would sell the 16 acres it now occupies in Fisher Park, along with other properties around the county , to private developers. The new property tax revenue generated from those sales would help pay the school system's portion of the bonds floated to build the new 250,000-square-foot headquarters on South Elm. City and County bond funds would also pay for the building."
It would be interesting to know just who the private developers are who are going to get the land swap deal from the school system as stated in the business journal. One fact that we know is that Roy Carroll owns land a few blocks away from this property and where does he fit in to this land swap deal or private developers deal because he might not have a financial interest in lee street but he sure does have plenty of property close to the school board buildings and other properties that the school owns in the area that is up for a land swap deal or private developers deal.
Today we have another post from Guarino with a title "The Airplane Trip To D.C., and our Elected Officials" CLICKHERE, great post.
Monday, June 29, 2009
Greensboro Mayor Amends 2007 and 2008 Campaign Forms for Second Time
Greensboro Mayor Yvonne Johnson has had to amend her 2007 and 2008 Campaign Contribution forms for the second time in the past month. This all started when Triadwatch was looking at the Mayor's campaign forms and noticed that in her 2008 Mid Year report she had a negative balance of -($3,087.56) then you proceed to see her 2008 year end report CLICKHERE then proceed to yvonne johnson on list of candidates, it shows at positive balance of $12,049.01 with no reporting of any contributions from individuals or PAC's for the whole year only expenditures that equaled $2,551.40.How can a candidate go from a negative to a positive balance with no contributions being brought in? This was the question to the Guilford County Board of Elections. But as the late, great Billy Mays would say " But Wait There's More" .
If you want to see the campaign contribution forms for 2007 CLICKHERE then proceed to Yvonne Johnson this will show you that the Mayor's 35 day report was amended twice and also the 2007 year end semi annual was amended twice with the mayor's treasurer last amending the forms on 6-9-2009.
While we are on the subject of Mayor Johnson's 2007 Year End Semi Annual report . Triadwatch has also found a huge discrepancy in her contribution information not given to the Guilford County Board of Elections. To see these forms click on the title of this post above which is "Greensboro Mayor Amends 2007 and 2008 Campaign Forms for Second Time" or CLICKHERE then proceed to year end semi annual for 2007.
North Carolina election laws states the following below
NCGS 173-278.11 states
(1) Contributions. – Except as provided in subsection (a1) of this section, a list of all contributions received by or on behalf of a candidate, political committee, or referendum committee. The statement shall list the name and complete mailing address of each contributor, the amount contributed, the principal occupation of the contributor, and the date such contribution was received. The total sum of all contributions to date shall be plainly exhibited. Forms for required reports shall be prescribed by the Board.
As used in this section, "principal occupation of the contributor" means the contributor's:a. Job title or profession; andb. Employer's name or employer's specific field of business activity."
Let's take a closer look at Mayor Johnson's 2007 year end semi annual campaign contribution report.
There were a total of 46 individual contributions given and out of those 46 as stated above 40 of those forms were left empty. On top of the 40 out of 46 with the above statute there were 7 missing addresses. There was also a unusual contribution from a company called click and pledge for a total of $188.94,if these new ways of giving are going to be used in future then they need to start providing the information to the treasurers as to who gave the $188.94.
The municipal election for Greensboro is just around the corner and the treasurers of all these candidates need to be aware of election law and filling out the proper forms to make sure it is filled out correctly just ask Guilford County Commissioners Paul Gibson, Skip Alston,and candidate Larry Proctor who had to amend their returns as well. The lax reporting needs to change and the time is now.
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Campaign Financing in North Carolina Will Get More Transparent With House Bill #388

Thursday, April 2, 2009
Action Greensboro Did Give Illegally to the Simkins Political Action Committee
To see the official letter from the State Board of Elections click on the title above or CLICKHERE
To understand the history of this issue Triadwatch has a post back on January 25, 2009 called "Letter of Inquiry to the State Board of Elections on Simkins PAC and Action Greensboro" CLICKHERE
Here are a few of the questions that were sent to the North Carolina State Board of Elections.
#1 Is the maximum contribution $4,000 per cycle?
YES
The Simkins PAC and Action Greensboro violated North Carolina General Statute 163-278.13 where the maximum amount that can be given is $4,000 per cycle.
#2 Can a 501(c)3 non profit organization like Action Greensboro give to a PAC?
NO
Action Greensboro was in violation of North Carolina General Statute 163-278.19 because Action Greensboro is registered with the Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)3 group and therefore is prohibited from making contributions to political action committees registered in the State of North Carolina. The next letter of inquiry should be to the Internal Revenue Service.
What happened to the $5,000 given to the Simkins PAC?
The state board concluded that this money was considered a prohibited receipt and would need to forfeit the contribution to the North Carolina Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund.
On March 6, 2009 a check in the amount of $5,000 was given to the North Carolina Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund by none other than Melvin "Skip" Alston, the treasurer of the Simkins PAC and also chairman of the Guilford County Board of Commissions and local lawyer R. Steve Bowden name was also on the letter from the state.
As reported in the past on Triadwatch, Skip Alston has his own link CLICKHERE , where you can see from past post that the Simkins PAC might need to hire another treasurer because he doesn't have a clue on campaign law or lately he doesn't have a clue on open meetings law as well.
This campaign contribution from Action Greensboro brings up a whole lot of issues that have been talked about in the past and need to be looked at more closely in the future.
Here is a good post on Joe Guarino's blog where Skip Moore from the Weaver Foundation and a member of Action Greensboro wanted to cover his you know what on this $5,000 contribution, here is the link CLICKHERE with a title "Action Greensboro's Pay to Play".
Campaign laws in this state are pretty clear and the total lax reporting of our local Guilford County politicians in regards to campaign contributions need a complete overhaul. The Greensboro municipal elections are coming up in fall and I would like to suggest to all of them to clean up their reports and make sure you are following state law or it will get reported and brought to the attention of our local board or in the case of the Action Greensboro, illegal contribution to the George Simkins Jr. Memorial Political Action Committee it will need to go to the North Carolina State Board of Elections.
This is citizen journalism at it's best.
Update: Local Post
Greensboro News and Record article CLICKHERE
Joe Guarino's Blog CLICKHERE
FEC CLICKHERE
Spag Report CLICKHERE
Yes! Weekly CLICKHERE
Piedmont Publius CLICKHERE
Tony Wilkins CLICKHERE
Greensboro Metro CLICKHERE
Saturday, March 14, 2009
N.C. Voters for Clean Elections with a BIll to END CANDIDATE RELIANCE ON SPECIAL INTEREST FUNDING
N.C. Voters for Clean Elections
PRESS RELEASE
March 12, 2009
Contact: Rep. Rick Glazier, 919-733-5601;
Chase Foster, NCVCE Director, 919-521-4121
BILL WOULD EXPAND SUCCESSFUL COUNCIL OF STATE PROGRAM, END CANDIDATE RELIANCE ON SPECIAL INTEREST FUNDING
Candidates running for State Treasurer and Commissioner of Labor could soon stop raising money from regulated groups and special interests if a bill being filed today becomes law.
Rep. Rick Glazier (D-Cumberland), Rep. Deborah Ross (D-Wake), Rep. Grier Martin (D-Wake), and Rep. Ray Rapp (D-Madison) are filing a bill today that would expand the state’s Voter-Owned Elections program to five additional statewide executive offices. The bill has 53 total sponsors.
A program that gained bipartisan participation in 2008 already offers a public financing option for candidates for State Auditor, Superintendent of Public Instruction, and Commissioner of Insurance. This proposed legislation would expand the program to include candidates for Attorney General, Secretary of State, State Treasurer, Commissioner of Agriculture, and Commissioner of Labor.
State Treasurer Janet Cowell said she supports the legislation because it would allow candidates for State Treasurer to realistically run without relying on contributions from regulated groups.
“Public financing is a proven reform that gives voters more control over government, makes public officials more accountable to constituents and levels the playing field,” Cowell said. “It also allows for greater transparency and avoids the appearance of conflicts of interest.”
Commissioner of Insurance Wayne Goodwin also endorsed the legislation, saying that the program had been a boon to grassroots campaigning in his race this past year. “It allowed me to spend more time listening to voters at courthouses and barbecue joints and festivals and senior centers all along the campaign trail,” he said. “The program should be expanded, so that those offices can benefit from a return to grassroots democracy as well.”
State Auditor Beth Wood said she supports the Voter-Owned Elections legislation, citing its ability to increase the diversity of candidates running for office. “This program opens the door for all qualified candidates to run for office,” she said. “Elections should be about your community support, not about your ability to raise money.”
And Superintendent of Public Instruction June Atkinson also praised the bill, calling the program’s voter guide—which would include profiles of all statewide office seekers and be mailed to millions of North Carolina households—a boon for voter engagement. “It allows us to put our qualifications directly in front of the voters, without having to rely on other media forms,” she said. “This way voters can make an informed choice about which candidates to support for these important offices.”
Under Voter-Owned Elections, candidates are able to receive a public grant to finance their campaign if they demonstrate broad community support and agree to strict spending and fundraising limits. Candidates who participate in the Council of State program are barred from most PAC money, out-of-state donations, and contributions over $200, and are not allowed to fundraise during the six months prior to the general election.
Rep. Glazier said the Council of State pilot succeeded beyond people’s expectations in last year’s election, dramatically reducing the fundraising role of special interest groups and allowing a diverse group of candidates to run without relying on large checks or special interest groups. “We want to build on this success and allow other offices to experience this program’s benefit,” he said. “Candidates should be able to run for Commissioner of Labor or Insurance without relying on money from the industries those offices regulate.”
In recent years, the Council of State has been dogged by the perception that its officeholders have been unduly influenced by their campaign donors. But reform organizations say public campaign financing is helping to change that perception. A report conducted by NC Voters for Clean Elections found that in 2004 66% of then-Commissioner of Insurance Jim Long’s itemized campaign money came from industries regulated directly by the insurance department. In 2008, this number dropped to less than 5% of the campaign money received by current-Commissioner of Insurance Wayne Goodwin, reflecting a stark change in the race’s money dynamic.
According to the 2008 Commissioner of Insurance candidates, the Voter-Owned Elections altered the culture and climate of the insurance race as well, with 22 one-on-one debates and a near level playing field when it came to campaign spending. John Odom the Republican nominee and Wayne Goodwin, the Democratic nominee wrote a joint guest column together a few weeks before the November election, saying the program allowed them to spend more time with voters and better prepare themselves for service.
“Every day we know there’s no need to schmooze with powerful industry leaders and VIPs,” they wrote for the Fayetteville Observer. “Every day we are relieved by the knowledge that we can spend the entire day listening to voters and serving the people of North Carolina.”
Glazier said he is confident that the legislation would prove valuable for the rest of the Council of State. “By removing even the perception of a conflict of interest, this program increases public confidence in government.”
###
---
Chase Foster
Director, NC Voters for Clean Elections
(919)521-4121chase@ncvce.org
http://www.ncvce.org/
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Senate Bill #415 Will Make Greensboro City Attorney Be Under City Council

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT TO AMEND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF GREENSBORO REGARDING
APPOINTMENT OF THE CITY ATTORNEY.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. Section 4.21 of the Charter of the City of Greensboro, being Chapter
1137 of the Session Laws of 1959, reads as rewritten:
"Sec. 4.21. City Attorney; Appointment, Compensation, Powers, and Duties.
(a) The city council shall appoint the city attorney who shall hold office at the pleasure
of the city council and shall receive such compensation as it may fix.
(b) The city attorney shall (1) serve as legal advisor to the city council, the city manager
and all city departments, officers and agencies; (2) represent as counsel the city, its officers,
agents, or employees, in any legal action arising out of or connected with the proper functions
of the city, its officers, agents, or employees, unless disqualified to so act; (3) approve as to
form all ordinances and resolutions, including initiated or referred ordinances, prior to their
introduction."
SECTION 2. This act is effective when it becomes law.
_________________________________________________________
This bill will make the Greensboro City Attorney report to the Greensboro City Council not the Greensboro City Manager as the law stated.
Much debate has been talked from the Greensboro City Council who wanted to add this to the short session back in 2008 with City Council member Mike Barber and Councilwomen Goldie Wells having great debate on the pros and cons.Now it seems like a bill will be passed and the only other city left to change this rule would be the City of High Point.
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Letter of Inquiry to the State Board of Elections on Simkins PAC and Action Greensboro
Below is the letter sent to the North Carolina Board of Elections in regards to some questionable campaign gifts as the Rhino Times has titled.The letter was sent a few months ago and is still sitting in Raleigh. We will see what the State Board of Elections has to say about this issue. Stay tune.
______________________________________________________
North Carolina Board of Elections
ATTN: Kim Strach, Director of Campaign Finance
P.O.Box 27255
Raleigh, N.C.27611-7255
This is a formal inquiry into the 3rd quarter campaign contributions for the George C Simkins Jr Memorial Political Action Committee
SBOE ID # STA-C3750N-C-001
According to their 3rd quarter campaign disclosure report for 2008 on page 3 of form there is a $5,000 contribution from
Action Greensboro
317 S. Elm Street
Greensboro N.C. 27401
336-379-0821
This contribution brings up a lot of issues that need to be resolved or brought to the attention of the NCBOE. Below is a few questions that need to be addressed.
Is the maximum contribution $4,000 per cycle?
Can a 501c3 non profit organization like Action Greensboro give to a PAC?
It is listed as contributions from indviduals on line #6 under receipts, how is that possible?
Victor Farah has no job title or employers name under contributor information, is that allowable? NCGS 163-278.11 states that this needs to be provided and the best efforts for the treasurer is out the door on this treasurer Mr. Alston.
Is it also illegal for a professional association, corporation or business entity to contribute to a political committee under NCGS 163-278.19?
Also on 4-17-08 on the first quarter reports there is a outside source of funding which is a transfer of funds from a certificate of deposit, the question, is this a legitimate outside source and do they have to disclose the whole funding from this certificate of deposit or can it be a open funding tool with no indication of how much money is there to be had?
The enclosed attachments will highlight the problems with this report from this Political Action Committee.
These are some questions that need to be answered about this Political Action Committee and would like a response back as soon as possible and a e-mail to see if there is something else that needs to be done to find out about this issue with the George C Simkins Jr. Memorial PAC. Thank you very much and a reply is requested as soon as possible.
Keith T. Brown
3728 Pembroke Terrace
High Point North Carolina 27265
336-812-3630
e-mail: tarheez3@yahoo.com
Friday, October 31, 2008
3rd Quarter Campaign Contributions in Guilford County are Online Check Out The Money
Some observations is that there are certain North Carolina General Statutes that the treasurers on these campaign committees need to abide by and looking at some of these returns it seems that 2 of the Guilford County Commissioners at large candidates committees need to go back to the drawing board on showing transparency on their campaign forms.Below is the actual North Carolina General Statute and looking at their returns it seems that Paul Gibson who is his own treasurer needs to fill out the forms completely. Larry Proctor's treasurer William Depriest was in never never land filling out the forms. There will be a call made to the Guilford County Board of Elections on these and other campaign forms not filled out right or completely. Time for a change in Guilford County and filling out the proper campaign forms is a start in the right direction in transparency in local government.
§ 163‑278.11. Contents of treasurer’s statement of receipts and expenditures.
(a) Statements filed pursuant to provisions of this Article shall set forth the following:
(1) Contributions. – Except as provided in subsection (a1) of this section, a list of all contributions received by or on behalf of a candidate, political committee, or referendum committee. The statement shall list the name and complete mailing address of each contributor, the amount contributed, the principal occupation of the contributor, and the date such contribution was received. The total sum of all contributions to date shall be plainly exhibited. Forms for required reports shall be prescribed by the Board. As used in this section, “principal occupation of the contributor” means the contributor’s:
a. Job title or profession; and
b. Employer’s name or employer’s specific field of business activity







