Thursday, December 15, 2011

On Robbie's Lobbyist vote

Self-dealing is a form of conflict of interest.

...“a situation where one takes an action in an official capacity
which involves dealing with oneself in a private capacity
and which confers a benefit on oneself."



...“You work for government and use your official position
to secure a contract for a private consulting company you own”
or “using your government position to get a summer job for your daughter”.

Where a fiduciary has engaged in self-dealing,
this constitutes a breach of the fiduciary relationship.

Wiki

If political self-dealing involves an elected official
taking advantage of an undisclosed position in a transaction
and acts in self interest
instead of the interests of those represented,
did Robbie Perkins vote for a Federal lobbyist
involve unethical conduct unbecoming a Mayor 
which violated the trust between Robbie and his constituents
through their tax dollars?
.
"A member of the board or any other body
exercising quasi‑judicial functions
...shall not participate in or vote
on any quasi‑judicial matter in a manner
that would violate affected persons' constitutional rights
to an impartial decision maker.

Impermissible conflicts include, but are not limited to,
a member having a fixed opinion prior to hearing the matter
that is not susceptible to change,
undisclosed ex parte communications, a close familial, business,
or other associational relationship with an affected person,
or a financial interest in the outcome of the matter."

§ 160A‑388.

Did the other City Council Members know
about Robbie's relationship with the family of the lobbyist?

No comments:

NEWSBUSTED at NEWSBUSTERS.ORG 2-18-2015