If a family of 2 parents and 3 kids can’t afford a vacation,
and the parents decide on a family election in which the 3 kids vote in favor,
who should accept responsibility when the parents can't pay the mortgage?
If Greensboro's City Council put debt on the ballot for what we don't need
for the electorate to vote for, and recieve campaign donations
from those who would benefit from the increased debt,
like members of the publicly financed Greensboro Partnership and Dowtown Greensboro,
of which the leading news outlets are a part of and actively support,
whose fault is it if our finances deteriorate,
those who voted to place the debt on the ballot (parents/commissioners)
and those who promoted it, and/or the manipulated children/electorate?
No comments:
Post a Comment