Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Geopolitics

If Gazelles need water and grass
and Cheetahs need water and Gazelles
and an abundance of sustenance leads to more Gazelles
should more Gazelles and water lead to more Cheetahs?

If too many Gazelles relative to water and grass lead to fewer Gazelles
do fewer Gazelles = fewer Cheetahs?

If Cheetahs and Gazelles were people
who would be who?

If need is sustenance and a temperate climate
should you not do what you don’t want done to you
unless you need to?

What do you do if you possess a brief case that may contain either $0 or $1,000,000
and are offered $200,000 for the case?

What if the majority of a civilization
collectively chose the case and lost
but most don’t know?

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

If the purchasing power of US and Europe are the Cheetahs, Asia workforce are the Gazzells, and Oil producing countries are water.

Anonymous said...

Whomever has the most dominant military are the Cheetahs, the Gazzells are everybody else, the grass is what the gazzells produce and the water is natuaral resources.

Anonymous said...

The Cheetahs were those who profited or sold or made fees off of real estate while the government subzidised the $8,000 tax credit, which was the grass.

The Gazzelles were the folks that purchased real estate with the tax credit at artificially high prices, who are about to be underwater on thier mortgages.

The water is money.

Anonymous said...

The Cheetahs are politicians

The Gazzelles are the confidence of the people

The Grass is campaign cash

The Water is the electorate.

Anonymous said...

The Cheetahs are those selling

The Gazzelles are those buying

The Grass is advertizing

The Water is money

Anonymous said...

[Don't] do what you don’t want done to you
unless you need to

Anonymous said...

"What if the majority of a civilization
collectively chose the case and lost
but most don’t know?"

Deep

NEWSBUSTED at NEWSBUSTERS.ORG 2-18-2015