and Cheetahs need water and Gazelles
and an abundance of sustenance leads to more Gazelles
should more Gazelles and water lead to more Cheetahs?
If too many Gazelles relative to water and grass lead to fewer Gazelles
do fewer Gazelles = fewer Cheetahs?
If Cheetahs and Gazelles were people
who would be who?
If need is sustenance and a temperate climate
should you not do what you don’t want done to you
unless you need to?
What do you do if you possess a brief case that may contain either $0 or $1,000,000
and are offered $200,000 for the case?
What if the majority of a civilization
collectively chose the case and lost
but most don’t know?
7 comments:
If the purchasing power of US and Europe are the Cheetahs, Asia workforce are the Gazzells, and Oil producing countries are water.
Whomever has the most dominant military are the Cheetahs, the Gazzells are everybody else, the grass is what the gazzells produce and the water is natuaral resources.
The Cheetahs were those who profited or sold or made fees off of real estate while the government subzidised the $8,000 tax credit, which was the grass.
The Gazzelles were the folks that purchased real estate with the tax credit at artificially high prices, who are about to be underwater on thier mortgages.
The water is money.
The Cheetahs are politicians
The Gazzelles are the confidence of the people
The Grass is campaign cash
The Water is the electorate.
The Cheetahs are those selling
The Gazzelles are those buying
The Grass is advertizing
The Water is money
[Don't] do what you don’t want done to you
unless you need to
"What if the majority of a civilization
collectively chose the case and lost
but most don’t know?"
Deep
Post a Comment