Showing posts with label Budget Cuts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Budget Cuts. Show all posts

Monday, April 11, 2011

On Donald Patterson's housing article and what may be a massive Greensboro and Guilford County tax increase when real estate is reassessed in 2012

"Four years ago, in February 2007,
the average price of houses sold in the Triad peaked at more than $205,000.

Ten months later, the nation would plunge into a prolonged recession from which the local housing market
— and the economy at large — has yet to recover.

Evidence can be seen in the latest housing figures,
which show that the average sale price in February 2011 had dropped to just over $156,000.

That’s a decline of nearly $49,000, or 24 percent,
and the lowest average in more than 13 years.

The number of sales in the Triad has plunged as well,
dropping nearly 48 percent in the past 6 1/2 years.

Economists say the situation may get worse before it gets better.

“We’ve been through a bad downturn,” said Don Jud,
a professor emeritus at UNCG’s Bryan School of Business
...“We are not certain that we are at the bottom yet.”

Housing numbers for Guilford County are just as bleak as those in the Triad.

In September, housing prices in the county fell below $152,000,
the lowest average since Jud began collecting data in 1997.

That represents a decline of more than $45,000, or 23 percent,
in the past four years.

If most Guilford County residential real estate
has fallen below the last assessment values
and most commercial property values
have experienced what may be somewhere between 30 to 40% declines,
will residential homeowners have to overcompensate
for the lost tax revenue from commercial properties
after reassessment occurs in 2012?

In addition, since November 2004,
the number of houses sold in the county has dropped nearly 45 percent.

...Among houses priced more than $500,000, the slump is particularly acute.

Across the Triad, Jud said, there’s more than a 40-month supply sitting on the market.

If many of what was assessed between $450,000 and $1,500,000
from 2004 through 2012
may be assessed between $275,000 and $850,000 in 2012,
while those in the middle remained relatively the same,
how much is who going to have to make up what difference?

Longtime real estate agents say they’ve never encountered such a housing slump locally.

...Locally, the housing market experienced “a severe slump,” Jud said, rather than a crash.

...Part of that decline can be attributed to the area’s weak labor market.

Data show that as employment rates fell in the Triad, so did housing prices.

Should Guilford County borrow hundreds of millions as our tax base falls?

“Employment is always a driver,” Jud said. “We have had one of the weakest employment markets of any around the country.”

$337.38 million that may not need borrowing
as federal and state subsidies fall and local tax revenues drop?

...the Greensboro-High Point metro area
has about the same number of jobs today (315,895) as it had in 1996 (314,966)."

Donald

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Does New York State's 2011 budget eliminate 53,333 jobs?

New York State 2010 $136.5 billion budget - New York State 2011 $132.5 billion budget = $4 Billion less = $4 billion / $75,000 = 53,333 jobs?

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Greensboro's Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Vaughan on Eliminating the City's Paid State Lobbyist from the Budget Video Embedded




At the Greensboro City Council meeting for June 1, 2010 Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Vaughan has introduced the idea of discontinuing the use of a paid state lobbyist that is costing the taxpayers of Greensboro  $45,772 . The embedded video above will show you what the Mayor Pro Tem is proposing.

On April 18, 2009 Triadwatch had a post titled "Greensboro's paid state lobbyist Cam Cover Bills for the past 2 years", CLICKHERE

Mayor Pro Tem is looking at this years budget and knows that the Greensboro Partnership is getting their budget cut by $20,000 and if they eliminate the paid state lobbyist money that they can bring back the money for the partnership and still be close to a net savings of around $30,000. This is a start to save this money and maybe in the future can eliminate the money to the Greensboro Partnership as well because Jason Allen and Wendy Poteat have combined this year to have a hefty bill for the first quarter of this year for $9.960 for being a lobbyist for the Greensboro Partnership.

It was also interesting to hear her say that we are our best lobbyist being a Greensboro City Council member and our relationship with the Guilford delegation is pretty strong. It also doesn't hurt when you happen to be the wife of a North Carolina State Senator in Don Vaughan you sure do have the ear of what is going on in Raleigh and if he doesn't listen to you then off to the couch he goes.

Also at the council meeting we heard City Council member Trudy Wade mention that the past 2 years Mike Barber and I have been wanting to get rid of this expense of having a paid state lobbyist but nothing has been done about it. This is a tough budget time and everything is on the table and this expense is a no brainer to get rid of Cam Cover  as the paid state lobbyist. It makes sense to do so and if it does happen we could give a local award to the City of Greensboro as a recipient of the Citizens Against Government Waste Greensboro edition.

There is probably going to be some opposition from the city attorney's office to not eliminate this money from the budget and keep the taxpayer funded paid lobbyist intact. Brooks Pierce Law Firm is where Cam Cover is a paralegal and a lobbyist and also provides assistance to a local attorney in Jim Phillips who i am sure doesn't want to eliminate this payment to Cam Cover. The Brooks Pierce Law firm does a lot with the City of Greensboro and will probably object to this elimination but hopefully the Greensboro City Council will finally start saving some taxpayer funded money and eliminate Cam Cover as the paid state lobbyist for the City of Greensboro.








Bookmark and Share

Monday, February 8, 2010

Did Greensboro just lose about $500,000 of revenue from rescinded subdivision annexations?

Judge overturns McLeansville annexations

Three McLeansville subdivisions are no longer a part of the city…

Four McLeansville residents sued Greensboro last year to stop the planned July 1 annexation. Late last week Judge Edwin Wilson sided with residents, who argued the city could not hold them to agreements made with the subdivisions developers.

Wilson’s means that the three subdivision — including 151 acres and about 285 homes — were never part of the city.

…Between 1997 and 2000, developers of the Whitehurst Village, Hartwood Village and Laurel Park subdivisions — just east of the city off Interstate 85 in the area of Mount Hope Church Road — asked the city to annex the land.

In exchange for their petition for annexation, the city built water and sewer lines out into the subdivisions.

When the city got around to annexing the land years later, some people who purchased those homes said they did not know they were going to become part of Greensboro.

Council members approved the annexation in April 2009, even though 39 homeowners signed petitions asking to withdraw the annexation request made by the developers.

Amanda Lehmert
Greensboro News and Record

NEWSBUSTED at NEWSBUSTERS.ORG 2-18-2015