Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Skip Alston, Paul Gibson, Billy Yow, Brenda Jones Fox and Dian Brigman

"...Commissioners Chairman Melvin “Skip” Alston dismissed the talk of firing Fox.

“I don’t think there’s any basis whatsoever for it,” Alston said.
“I think it’s something that’s being orchestrated by Paul and Billy with a lot of misinformation.”

What misinformation?

If Skip saying Paul and Billy are lying about something,
should Joe report exactly what Skip is saying they are lying about?

“The people who say they’re dissatisfied have probably not spoken with Brenda,” Alston said.
“It’s a matter of communication.”

If one were to ask Fox of her prior relationship with Brigman,
Vice Chairwoman of the Guilford County Planning Board,
should the questioner take the denial at face value,
or should one ask how Fox did not know Brigman?

Alston said that in her two years in the position,
he has seen Fox grow into one of the best county managers he’s worked with in the last 18 years
and one of the most accountable.

Was Fox held accountable for Steve Arnold's job?

How will Fox be held accountable for Brigman's contract?

...he applauds the manager for “thinking outside the box” to get leads on land,
but said Grantham’s office should have been brought into the loop.

“I’m an accredited land consultant
and being on the planning board keeps me plugged in”

Dian Brigman
Vice Chairwoman of the Guilford County Planning Board
Unknown to Brenda Jones Fox before meeting about the real estate contract

“Hindsight is 20/20,” he said. “I think looking back on it,
everyone should have been clear about what was happening.

Is Skip angeling to get Guilford County real estate contracts?

Ever asked Skip if now is a good time to buy?

His office shouldn’t have had to find out about it in the papers.”

How will Fox be held accountable
for not informing the real estate buying department
of Fox's doubts of the County's ability to perform?

Alston, who is in the real estate business,
said he has reviewed the contract and isn’t too worried about its particulars."

Joe, Joe

No comments: